ableton vs cubase vs nuendo vs pro tools

#Ableton vs cubase vs nuendo vs pro tools movie#
#Ableton vs cubase vs nuendo vs pro tools full#
#Ableton vs cubase vs nuendo vs pro tools software#

If they don't want users in that market, they certainly won't have any.

But ultimately, appealing to or ignoring the post market, composers and users of other DAWs is up to Presonus, not forum posters. Graytermedia wroteAs far as Post is concerned, there seems to be a lot of 'we don't want your kind here' in this group. Same applies for the 3 versions of Studio One, and Cubase vs Nuendo. That was quite obvious even with the demos dating back to Ultimate vs. It's the same program from top to bottom, unlocked depending on the license you pay for. And the user base figured out many years ago that the only difference between PT with post features (currently 'Flex') and PT vanilla ('Artist') is a few hidden menu items unlocked when you pay more money for a different license code-class.

#Ableton vs cubase vs nuendo vs pro tools full#

That's because ProTools users that participate there are (or were) mostly full time industry professionals, or aspiring to be. Everyone seems to coexist with one another. What you don't see on the Avid groups is the music folks up in arms because Post folks use the tool too. Graytermedia wrotePro Tools is used by music producers, mixers, sound designers, audio book creators, dialogue editors and film mixers. Additionally, Avid owns Media Composer and Pro Tools plays perfectly with it, for obvious reasons. Steinberg and PreSonus have most of the hardware needed to compete there, but the services are not on par.

Cloud based storage and collaboration services like Sphere and Splice simply do not compete against solutions like Avid in that space. Turnkey solutions and vertical integration rule that market. Hollywood is basically an enterprise market. Prosumers in the music production market don’t understand this because they’ve never operated within that market segment.

#Ableton vs cubase vs nuendo vs pro tools software#

Avid winning has more to do with the infrastructure around the software, not the software itself. This is why companies like Adobe and Blackmagic have been trying to develop collaboration solution, among other things. Avid just provides the most seamless solution for that production pipeline. They have an entire pipeline for everything from acquisition to storage to collaboration to delivery. And believe me, that's what it would take.Īvids ecosystem beyond the hardware is supreme.

#Ableton vs cubase vs nuendo vs pro tools movie#

Until someone mixes a Marvel movie in S1, Reaper, Ableton or Nuendo (the closest of them all), PT isn't going anywhere for Post. Hollywood is subsidizing Avid, and they're not walking away from that investment anytime soon. I say this every time the question is asked, 'Why do people still use Pro Tools?'. If Nuendo and Pyramix still haven’t been able to take it down, adding these three features to Studio One isn’t even going to come close.) You’re going to need a lot more than that to capture the Cubase or Pro Tools crowds. **If FenderSonus wants to capture the Protools, Logic,Cubase crowd. Graytermedia wrote nathanielwalker2 wrote shanabit wroteNEEDED: